Obligatory Limbaugh post

8 03 2012

I fully realize that this post will be about as time-sensitive as anything, but I feel like it has to be said. Rush Limbaugh has made a name for himself by being an egotistical, overbearing loudmouth. Recently, he said some things that were unbelievably prejudiced against women. In response, there was an enormous public backlash and many of his radio show’s advertisers began backing away. Naturally, this led to Limbaugh’s supporters’ cries of foul play and censorship.

Well, they are wrong.

Withdrawal of sponsorship or public criticism of a man’s comments does not mean anyone is censoring anyone else. Freedom of speech does not give one freedom from consequence. Limbaugh said some things that were offenstive to many people. He did not say these things in some dark backroom. He said them publically, on his nationally-syndicated radio show. Not one government official or law enforcement office broke down his door to arrest him. He said what he said and now he gets to deal with the consequences.

No business is required to work with Limbaugh. Their sponsorship of his program was a reflection upon themselves. If businesses like Citrix, AOL, and JCPenney decide that his program no longer reflects well on their brand or reputation, they are free to withdraw support in accordance with whatever contract they had set up.

The First Amendment works both ways. You can say something so outrageous that it offends an entire nation. On the other hand, you must also respect the backlash that offence will bring you.




3 responses

20 06 2012
Jayson Manship

So, do you disagree with Rush? Or do you think the media is just being short-sighted?

20 06 2012

I strongly disagreed with the things he said. I think the people and the media outlets who were saying that advertisers leaving was a First Amendment thing were trying to make something out of nothing.

21 06 2012
Jayson Manship

I ask because I run a company that works with a lot of ‘conservative’ clients and I’m looking for a good developer. I liked your blog and was intrigued that you wrote a post about something political.

I agree with you. His comments in this scenario were over-the-top, and I also agree about the way the advertisers handled it. Although, I think their reaction was probably more symbolic than real, and I wouldn’t be surprised if a few of them made a bold statement just for the press associated with making a bold statement.

Anywho, great stuff. If you are interested in potentially working with some right-leaning clients, you can email me at jayson at insourcecode.com.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: